Jaguar XJS 1991 vs BMW 8 series 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 6.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 5.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 226 - 318 HP | 218 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 471 NM | 400 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 8.2 seconds | 6 - 7.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 14.9 | 11.0 - 18.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJS petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 8 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.34 m | |
| Jaguar XJS is 5 cm longer than the BMW 8 series, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJS is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJS has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJS has 87 litres more trunk space than the BMW 8 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJS is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 8 series, which means Jaguar XJS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`139 | ~ 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJS has
|
BMW 8 sērija has
| |